Tag Archives: Gladehurst

Tenancy Deposit Schemes: A New Dawn?

Regular readers will know that I have blogged about Tenancy Deposit Schemes a number of times before, in particular regarding the series of cases that came before the senior courts over the last couple of years which blunted the sanctions … Continue reading

Posted in Introductory, Leasehold Opinion, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tenancy Deposit Scheme changes coming

Some say what has happened to the tenancy deposit legislation constituted perverse judicial interference, I’m not so sure.  However, the government did decide to act after decisions like Tiensia and Gladehurst severely diluted the original intention of the legislation. Amendments … Continue reading

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Don’t forget the prescribed information

The last 12 months have seen a plethora of cases coming before the higher courts concerning the tenancy deposit legislation in sections 212, 213 and 214 of the Housing Act 2004.  I have blogged about most of them! When we … Continue reading

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Localism Bill to address Tenancy Deposit Scheme perversity?

I must admit to being somewhat behind the curve on this news, but after the recent Court of Appeal decisions in Gladehurst Properties Ltd v Hashemi (see https://leaseholdlawyer.wordpress.com/2011/05/30/more-deposit-protection-developments/) and Potts v Densley (see https://leaseholdlawyer.wordpress.com/2011/05/26/tenancy-deposit-protection-developments/) which themselves followed on from the landmark … Continue reading

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

More Tenancy Deposit Protection Developments

Well we didn’t have to wait long since my most recent blog to report back on a further case relating to Tenancy Deposit Schemes.  However, the Courts are pushing the door further shut on tenants seeking to recover a fine … Continue reading

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments